Can you say "Conflict of Interest?"

First of all, NPR did reviewed the Smithsonian's deal with Showtime (NPR does not support deep linking - and I love NPR - but I don't give a damn). If you're not familiar, the Smithsonian has signed a mysterious contract with Showtime to create a Smithsonian on Demand channel which gives Showtime rights to air Smithsonian material on this new channel. Essentially, it seems, anyone making a film with Smithsonian materials must offer the film to Showtime before they are allowed access to the matierals. On top of that, if you will not tell Showtime what it is you are trying to film, they can deny you access to Smithsonian materials. So, you'll have to share your idea with a producer who could, theoretically, take your idea and run. Of course, the Smithsonian is getting revenue for this (though how much is unclear) and Showtime basically gets first dibs on any films being made with the materials. While the Smithsonian is not bound by the Freedom of Information Act, they have a history of being very forthcoming. However, the will not release the contract into which they have entered with Showtime.

Linda St. Thomas, Director of Media for the Smithsonian, sounded aghast that "any filmmaker could walk in, pay a daily location fee, and film whatever they want." She cites the need to control the collection; and, while working in a museum I acknowledge the need to control and protect the collection, but this deal is a liability for those filmmakers who do not wish to work with Showtime, but wish to use Smithsonian materials. In this case, I think the Smithsonian should rework the contract to protect not only the collection, but access to that collection by allowing filmmakers access EQUAL to Showtime's access. In addition, Showtime should have NO control over access policies of a publically funded instituion.

imagine no possesions
i wonder if you can
no need for greed or hunger,
a brotherhood for man
Imagine by John Lennon